|
 |

27-06-2008, 10:54 AM
|
 |
Really Wild Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sheffield, South Yorks, UK
Posts: 2,414
|
|
Seems to have been one good decision not to extend Greenland whaling but no reduction in previously agreed quotas.
BBC NEWS | Science/Nature | Greenland denied on whale catch
It does make you wonder how dependent some of these 'indigenous' people are on whalemeat. 
__________________
"I started off with nothing ... and I've still got most of it left."
Seasick Steve
|

29-06-2008, 01:46 PM
|
 |
Really Wild Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sheffield, South Yorks, UK
Posts: 2,414
|
|
Well, some people seem to be vaguely optimistic but I don't see that there is much room for 'compromise'
BBC NEWS | Science/Nature | Whale meet ends with peace agenda
__________________
"I started off with nothing ... and I've still got most of it left."
Seasick Steve
|

29-06-2008, 05:01 PM
|
 |
Wild Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 458
|
|
What I find difficult to comprehend is that they are happy to wait another year before they will try and come to the mentioned 'package deal' and how they can be optimistic is another great mystery. 
I don't suppose anybody knows what the Dutch representative stood for? I've been trying to find out, but with no luck this far. Last I heard she wasn't sure if she was going to give her full support to the anti-whaling campaign or not. That caused a major uproar as she is supposed to be a representation of the Dutch nation of which 90% is for a full ban on whaling. I was just interested to find out if she had in the end decided to totally go for a ban or not, but it doesn't even say on the Dutch anti-whaling orginazation site...
|

29-06-2008, 05:25 PM
|
 |
Really Wild Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sheffield, South Yorks, UK
Posts: 2,414
|
|
Don't I recall from an earlier report that all the EU nations voted together?
Why don't they give everyone a vote - apart from three or four countries and some so-called indigenous peoples most people would vote against whaling (or not vote at all). The Japanese might be able to bribe a cluster of Caribbean and other non-whaling governments but they wouldn't have enough money to bribe every individual!
Quote:
Originally Posted by frostfire
What I find difficult to comprehend is that they are happy to wait another year before they will try and come to the mentioned 'package deal' and how they can be optimistic is another great mystery. 
I don't suppose anybody knows what the Dutch representative stood for? I've been trying to find out, but with no luck this far. Last I heard she wasn't sure if she was going to give her full support to the anti-whaling campaign or not. That caused a major uproar as she is supposed to be a representation of the Dutch nation of which 90% is for a full ban on whaling. I was just interested to find out if she had in the end decided to totally go for a ban or not, but it doesn't even say on the Dutch anti-whaling orginazation site...
|
__________________
"I started off with nothing ... and I've still got most of it left."
Seasick Steve
|
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» New Wildlife Threads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Snowy owls
19-11-2008 12:28 PM
0 Replies, 22 Views
|
|
|
Zoos
18-11-2008 06:18 PM
26 Replies, 1,782 Views
|
|
|
|
|
» New Community Threads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi to all
13-11-2008 08:27 AM
18 Replies, 213 Views
|
» Stats |
Members: 9,719
Threads: 800
Posts: 3,942
Top Poster: paul m (2,414)
|
| Welcome to our newest member, Drosera |
|