» Welcome to the Wildlife and Environment Forums |
Wild About the World is a worldwide community covering everything from birds, insects, mammals and plants to travel, photography, climate change and conservation. Click here for your free login name and password.
We've just had a big redesign, clearout and added lots of new features so you can now upload photos and submit a link to your own wildlife and environment website.
|
 |
|

22-01-2008, 10:29 AM
|
 |
Really Wild Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: North Holland
Posts: 1,029
|
|
|
Eggs to Larvae
On the 15-05-2007 I saw these eggs on a million bell flower - which is strange in its self, finding eggs on vulnerable petals. The night before I saw a moth on the very same plant so expected they were moth eggs. I asked for an ID and was told they are probably stink bug eggs?
19-05-2007, they started to change colour.
24-05-2007 the eggs had gone very dark and by the state of the petal I didn't expect it to survive long enough for the eggs to hatch.
Later that evening though to my surprise, they had hatched and the tiny silver larvae were crawling all over the place! Thank goodness I went and checked or I would have totally missed everything!
The next day there was no sign that the eggs or larvae had ever been there and the petal had shrivelled. I saw no sign of stink bugs in the garden at all after that so I still have my doubt to the identity.
Last edited by goosey : 22-01-2008 at 01:24 PM.
Reason: spelling
|

22-01-2008, 12:08 PM
|
|
Wild Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 195
|
|
|
Great series Goosey!
Certainly no Stink Bug as their nymphs look a lot like tiny Stink Bugs already (not larva as in beetles or moth etc.). Moth seems very plausible, maybe even the one you saw. In theory they could also be wasps, can't quite make out the number of "belly legs" (?), but I think wasps don't generally produce quite that many eggs at once...
Thanks for sharing the pics
Arp
|

22-01-2008, 01:35 PM
|
 |
Really Wild Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: North Holland
Posts: 1,029
|
|
|
Thanks Arp for your thought. I wish I had checked the flower after I saw the moth, but I had no reason to expect that it had been laying eggs. Anyway it was dark at the time I was mothing with torch. I would love to think that after all the work and planning in attracting moths they were happy enough to lay eggs in the garden.
I didn't realise wasps could be a possibility - laying eggs like that. It is so different than the Cynips quercusfolii wasps (Cynipidae family)which lay their eggs on oak leaves which become galls. (Which happens to be te only thing about wasps)
|

22-01-2008, 02:43 PM
|
 |
Really Wild Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sheffield, UK
Posts: 1,342
|
|
|
Could be moth larvae but sawfly of some kind is a possibility.
__________________
"Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence."
Napoleon Bonaparte
|

22-01-2008, 03:41 PM
|
 |
Really Wild Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: North Holland
Posts: 1,029
|
|
I didn't think they were sawfly eggs purely because of the shape. I don't now if different types of sawfly produce different shape eggs but the sawfly eggs I have noted in the garden are and smooth, the same sort of shape as ladybird eggs but white, where these where more ridged spherical and white  .
Here is a picture of some sawfly eggs. http://www.wildabouttheworld.com/gallery/data//504/thumbs/2007-04-28_Sawfly_Larvae_2.jpg
|

22-01-2008, 04:39 PM
|
|
Wild Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 195
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by goosey
I didn't realise wasps could be a possibility - laying eggs like that.
|
Well, the "wasps" I was referring to would be the Sawflies already mentioned (which are not flies at all of course) and I think you're right about the egg shape - I had only looked at the hatchlings 
|

24-01-2008, 12:44 PM
|
 |
Active Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 64
|
|
|
From what I've read, one way to tell the difference between sawfly larvae and moth larvae is to count the legs. Sawfly larvae have 9 or more pairs of legs - 3 pairs of true legs at the front and 6 or more pairs of stumpy legs (called prolegs) at the back. Butterfly and moth caterpillars never have more than eight pairs of legs (3 pairs of true legs plus up to five pairs of prolegs).
Hard to tell how many legs the larvae in the photo have - but there don't seem to be enough legs to be sawflies.
|

24-01-2008, 12:52 PM
|
 |
Really Wild Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: North Holland
Posts: 1,029
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ozwildlife
From what I've read, one way to tell the difference between sawfly larvae and moth larvae is to count the legs. Sawfly larvae have 9 or more pairs of legs - 3 pairs of true legs at the front and 6 or more pairs of stumpy legs (called prolegs) at the back. Butterfly and moth caterpillars never have more than eight pairs of legs (3 pairs of true legs plus up to five pairs of prolegs).
Hard to tell how many legs the larvae in the photo have - but there don't seem to be enough legs to be sawflies.
|
That is a useful bit of information, something new I have learned today  .
Thanks.
The photo's aren't bril', the larvae and eggs were so tiny, and I rely on my trusty point and shoot camera with a macro facility.
|

24-01-2008, 12:57 PM
|
 |
Really Wild Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sheffield, UK
Posts: 1,342
|
|
Well, I still say sawflies for two reasons: (a) they have well-developed eyes and (b) they are rearing up which is a common defensive reaction with sawflies.
On the other hand I know very little about moths so could be wrong. Yes, the eggs do look quite like bug eggs but usually these are laid tightly clustered together, not loosely as here. e.g. http://www.utextension.utk.edu/field...tinkB_eggs.JPG
Incidentally, while trying to find information, I came up with this interesting looking site.:
Glossary of terms
__________________
"Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence."
Napoleon Bonaparte
|

24-01-2008, 02:59 PM
|
 |
Really Wild Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sheffield, UK
Posts: 1,342
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by paul m
Well, I still say sawflies for two reasons: (a) they have well-developed eyes and (b) they are rearing up which is a common defensive reaction with sawflies.
|
This is the pine sawfly showing the rearing action and the many legs!

__________________
"Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence."
Napoleon Bonaparte
Last edited by paul m : 24-01-2008 at 03:00 PM.
Reason: typo
|
 |
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» New Wildlife Threads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» New Community Threads |
|
|
Hi to all
13-05-2008 02:14 AM
5 Replies, 102 Views
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Stats |
Members: 8,554
Threads: 597
Posts: 2,879
Top Poster: paul m (1,342)
|
| Welcome to our newest member, envivatty |
|