Wild About The World
Go Back   Wild About The World > World Wildlife > Insects and Invertebrates
Register Members  
» Log in
User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
» Ads
» September 2010
S M T W T F S
293031 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 12
» ...
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-01-2008, 09:53 AM
paul m's Avatar
Really Wild Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sheffield, South Yorks, UK
Posts: 5,221
Ladybirds - Coccinellidae

Some people may be surprised that I've been on this forum for quite a while and never mentioned ladybirds ... ... that's all coming to an end now!

They're a very interesting family of beetles and quite easy to study. Gilles San Martin has opened a Flickr gallery Collection: Ladybirds illustrating many species, their life cycles, biology, ecology and how to find them!
Well worth a look or for reference ....
__________________
"Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence."
Napoleon Bonaparte
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-01-2008, 12:11 PM
goosey's Avatar
Really Wild Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 5,444
Oh, what a brilliant reference! The photo's are amazing, I love the detail of Anatis ocellata spines. The hatchling images are so clear. I spent days in the summer waiting for ladybird eggs to hatch and watched as the yellow eggs changed colour and the final hatching of what looked like tiny spiders - even on the macro setting of the camera. Seeing them in Gilles images is remarkable.
The only disaapointment was seeing those which were on pins - I hope they were already dead. You see them and other insects like that in old Victorian collections - does it still go on?
Otherwise I am so impressed - great find!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-01-2008, 02:33 PM
paul m's Avatar
Really Wild Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sheffield, South Yorks, UK
Posts: 5,221
Well, collection of specimens does go on in judicious amounts. For several reasons: some insects are impossible to identify for sure unless they're under a microscope and/or dissected. Similarly, if a new species or some such is found then it needs deep examination and description (to form a reference collection so that other people can learn to recognise it).

Fortunately, 99.99% of ladybirds can be identified without killing - and, generally, with the advances of digital photography it is much easier to record insects and provide evidence for verification.

For interest, the common means of killing beetles nowadays is to drop them into the freezer - this is, after all, how most of them die naturally. (I've been listening to the weather forecasts of snow blowing from Siberia!)

PS: most of the pinned specimens are rare species and undoubtedly were collected some time ago: I note, for instance, the 13-spot, Hippodamia tredecimpunctata which is not common in Europe - it has been seen twice in the UK in the last hundred years!


Quote:
Originally Posted by goosey View Post
Oh, what a brilliant reference! The photo's are amazing, I love the detail of Anatis ocellata spines. The hatchling images are so clear. I spent days in the summer waiting for ladybird eggs to hatch and watched as the yellow eggs changed colour and the final hatching of what looked like tiny spiders - even on the macro setting of the camera. Seeing them in Gilles images is remarkable.
The only disaapointment was seeing those which were on pins - I hope they were already dead. You see them and other insects like that in old Victorian collections - does it still go on?
Otherwise I am so impressed - great find!
__________________
"Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence."
Napoleon Bonaparte

Last edited by paul m; 02-01-2008 at 02:38 PM. Reason: PS
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-01-2008, 10:03 AM
goosey's Avatar
Really Wild Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 5,444
Talking of ladybirds, last winter there were quite a few 7 spots over-wintering in ecinacea seedheads and under fallen leaves that I had left in a sheltered pile. I saw the first active on 3rd February, two of them. On the whole there were less ladybirds during the spring and summer. 22 spots must have been the most numerous.
This winter I haven't seen any over wintering in the garden, I hope it won't be another bad year.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-01-2008, 03:18 PM
paul m's Avatar
Really Wild Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sheffield, South Yorks, UK
Posts: 5,221
Yes, they tend to wake up when the sun shines on them and then go back to slepp again. Can be very dangerous for them if they move away from their shelters and are overtaken by a sudden frost.

Mind, Majerus thinks that the orange ladybird can predict what the winter weather will be like .....

Evolution - April 1999: Peppered moths...NOT.

Quote:
Originally Posted by goosey View Post
Talking of ladybirds, last winter there were quite a few 7 spots over-wintering in ecinacea seedheads and under fallen leaves that I had left in a sheltered pile. I saw the first active on 3rd February, two of them. On the whole there were less ladybirds during the spring and summer. 22 spots must have been the most numerous.
This winter I haven't seen any over wintering in the garden, I hope it won't be another bad year.
__________________
"Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence."
Napoleon Bonaparte
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 03-01-2008, 09:45 PM
Guy F's Avatar
Wild Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 459
Some very good, and interesting shots there. Are they all British species or are there some European ladybirds in there as well? There are some there which I don't think I'd recognise as a Ladybird if I saw them, Cynegetis impunctata is one of them.

This year as I had the new camera I started paying more attention to Ladybirds (and most other insects) in the garden and I saw quite a few new species. Pine, 14-spot and Heather (id'd on WAB by you Paul) were all new for me. Also the moth trap attracted a Cream Spot and an Orange Ladybird, it's interesting to see what other insects are attracted to the light, assuming that's why they were there
Guy
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 04-01-2008, 09:28 AM
paul m's Avatar
Really Wild Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sheffield, South Yorks, UK
Posts: 5,221
No, the immaculate ladybird, Cynegetis impunctata has not yet been found in UK although there's no obvious reason that it shouldn't be: it's found around Calais! People have sometimes thought they've found it but it always turns out to be the spotless form of the 24-spot, Subcoccinella vigintiquattuorpunctata.

There are some other ladybirds which are quite common in NW Europe but have never made it across the Channel/Manche.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Guy F View Post
Some very good, and interesting shots there. Are they all British species or are there some European ladybirds in there as well? There are some there which I don't think I'd recognise as a Ladybird if I saw them, Cynegetis impunctata is one of them.

This year as I had the new camera I started paying more attention to Ladybirds (and most other insects) in the garden and I saw quite a few new species. Pine, 14-spot and Heather (id'd on WAB by you Paul) were all new for me. Also the moth trap attracted a Cream Spot and an Orange Ladybird, it's interesting to see what other insects are attracted to the light, assuming that's why they were there
Guy
__________________
"Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence."
Napoleon Bonaparte
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2008, 10:19 AM
paul m's Avatar
Really Wild Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sheffield, South Yorks, UK
Posts: 5,221
I'll be loading a few ladybird pictures - they're one of the most photogenic of insect families!
By and large these will all be European. I'd love to see pictures of ladybirds from elsewhere in the world.
This was Europe's largest, the pine ladybird Anatis ocellata:

__________________
"Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence."
Napoleon Bonaparte
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2008, 01:42 PM
H Dogg's Avatar
Wild Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 189
Quote:
Originally Posted by paul m View Post
I'll be loading a few ladybird pictures - they're one of the most photogenic of insect families!
By and large these will all be European. I'd love to see pictures of ladybirds from elsewhere in the world.
This was Europe's largest, the pine ladybird Anatis ocellata:

I know the latin name is right for your picture but Anatis ocellata is usually referred to as the eyed ladybird. Exochomus quadripustulatus is usually referred to as the pine ladybird, Although both are commonly found on pine tree's.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2008, 01:51 PM
paul m's Avatar
Really Wild Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sheffield, South Yorks, UK
Posts: 5,221
You are absolutely right Obviously my mind was on the tree! I shall amend that immediately. Thanks! Ah, don't need to - I got it right on the picture!

Actually, the pine ladybird Exochomus quadripustulatus, as was, is seldom seen on pines in my experience!

Quote:
Originally Posted by H Dogg View Post
I know the latin name is right for your picture but Anatis ocellata is usually referred to as the eyed ladybird. Exochomus quadripustulatus is usually referred to as the pine ladybird, Although both are commonly found on pine tree's.
__________________
"Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence."
Napoleon Bonaparte

Last edited by paul m; 08-01-2008 at 01:54 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2008, 02:07 PM
H Dogg's Avatar
Wild Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 189
Quote:
Originally Posted by paul m View Post
Actually, the pine ladybird Exochomus quadripustulatus, as was, is seldom seen on pines in my experience!
I Agree i see this species on a wide range of plants usually stinging nettles. I suppose that is another downfall of common names they can be very misleading. Although there does seem to be a very healthy population of A.Ocellata in my local patch, these are a species normally associated with pine's but i normally find them on other plants.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 18-01-2008, 07:49 PM
Wild Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 895
Ada.bip.?

Hi Paul,

Okay, you opened the door

As an excuse for testing the "attachment" options with (javascript switched off for starters) ... just today I was browsing some old sets of rather badly unorganized ladybird images and found these two. I think they are the same animal (but not 100% sure), about 4 days apart and I'm a little bit annoyed by the lacking colouration on the top of the 4th abdomen segment.

I know Ada.bip. has one of the most variable larvae, so I'm thinking this is probably just one of those, but maybe you have another option for it? I'm afraid the logic in that particular set of images is so far gone that I can't find the fitting puppae/bug to go with it (if it survived) - had a couple of hectic weeks that time.

So, Ada.bip. - you agree??

Cheers!
Arp

P.S. Ah, that was not the intended image handling - oh well.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg collage_watw.jpg (17.7 KB, 38 views)

Last edited by Pudding4brains; 18-01-2008 at 08:04 PM. Reason: Attachment
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 19-01-2008, 11:17 AM
paul m's Avatar
Really Wild Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sheffield, South Yorks, UK
Posts: 5,221
I would think so although I'm never too happy separating 2-spot from 10-spot (Adalia decempunctata). The early instars (left) especially ...
Looking forward to more pics ...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pudding4brains View Post
As an excuse for testing the "attachment" options with (javascript switched off for starters) ... just today I was browsing some old sets of rather badly unorganized ladybird images and found these two. I think they are the same animal (but not 100% sure), about 4 days apart and I'm a little bit annoyed by the lacking colouration on the top of the 4th abdomen segment.

I know Ada.bip. has one of the most variable larvae, so I'm thinking this is probably just one of those, but maybe you have another option for it? I'm afraid the logic in that particular set of images is so far gone that I can't find the fitting puppae/bug to go with it (if it survived) - had a couple of hectic weeks that time.

So, Ada.bip. - you agree??

Cheers!
Arp

P.S. Ah, that was not the intended image handling - oh well.
__________________
"Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence."
Napoleon Bonaparte
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 19-01-2008, 01:59 PM
Wild Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 895
Hi Paul,

Glad you agree. I think it's my only/first 2-spot larva with no bright brushes on the back

Quote:
Originally Posted by paul m View Post
I would think so although I'm never too happy separating 2-spot from 10-spot (Adalia decempunctata). The early instars (left) especially ...
Well yes, for I1 and most I2 that'll be quite hard, for I3 and I4 I have this "working thesis" that seems to suffice mostly (attached - was to small for gallery and attachment won't show linked in IMG-tags, sorry).

Edit: Ah, now I get a non-scripted link, so better to include it directly:

Very bad diagram showing main difference between larvae of 2-spot and 10-spot ladybirds (arrows) I use for ID. On 10-spot the indicated brushes would be white/light gray on 2-spot these would be white/gray with a black or dark gray center. The other (orange/white/gray) brushes drawn are quite variable of course (more so for 2-spot than 10-spot).

You think that works, or have you found many larvae that would prove it wrong?

Cheers!
Arp
Attached Images
File Type: jpg AdaBip_vs_AdaDec.jpg (25.4 KB, 40 views)

Last edited by Pudding4brains; 19-01-2008 at 03:14 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 21-01-2008, 04:33 PM
goosey's Avatar
Really Wild Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 5,444
I have a photo of a Calvia decemguttata from last year, I thought I would post to go with the discussion between Paul and Arp.


Last edited by goosey; 02-02-2009 at 08:50 PM. Reason: re add image
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 21-01-2008, 05:29 PM
Wild Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 895
Hi goosey,

Not much "discussion" (about Cal.dec.), but certainly a nice picture. Because of the transparency I would be almost tempted to think Hal.sed., but it clearly isn't - must be a really freshly hatched one me thinks. Nice!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 22-01-2008, 06:40 AM
goosey's Avatar
Really Wild Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 5,444
[quote=Pudding4brains;2914]Hi goosey,

Not much "discussion" (about [i]Cal.dec.[/iQUOTE]

Yep! sorry you are right , I was thinking about the Calvia decemguttata larvae you had posted in the gallery and only saw the word decemguttata in the above posts.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 22-01-2008, 12:16 PM
Wild Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 895
Well, it's still a general Ladybird thread so your Calvia is more than welcome (to me certainly). Btw, I encountered what I believe to be the same animal on the WAB-archive last night - am I right in assuming they're two images of the same beast and that the shots were taken in NL? I think Paul mentioned they're not (yet) listed for the UK.

I uploaded an image yesterday where one is sitting next to the somewhat similar 16-spotted Halyzia. For this year I hope to find both of these species together with a 14-spotted Calvia and maybe even the similar variety of the 10-spot and get them all in one shot - but maybe I'm aiming too high

Cheers!
Arp
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 22-01-2008, 01:48 PM
goosey's Avatar
Really Wild Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 5,444
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pudding4brains View Post
Btw, I encountered what I believe to be the same animal on the WAB-archive last night - am I right in assuming they're two images of the same beast and that the shots were taken in NL? I think Paul mentioned they're not (yet) listed for the UK.

I uploaded an image yesterday where one is sitting next to the somewhat similar 16-spotted Halyzia. For this year I hope to find both of these species together with a 14-spotted Calvia and maybe even the similar variety of the 10-spot and get them all in one shot - but maybe I'm aiming too high
Yes - it's the same ladybird! Actually it was my first dealing with Paul and I frightened the life out of him as he didn't realise at first it was taken in Holland and thought they had infiltrated Britain like the harlequins .
I felt awful, luckily he forgave me

It would be a great comparison to be able to get all three in one shot!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 24-01-2008, 01:10 PM
paul m's Avatar
Really Wild Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sheffield, South Yorks, UK
Posts: 5,221
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pudding4brains View Post
Very bad diagram showing main difference between larvae of 2-spot and 10-spot ladybirds (arrows) I use for ID. On 10-spot the indicated brushes would be white/light gray on 2-spot these would be white/gray with a black or dark gray center. The other (orange/white/gray) brushes drawn are quite variable of course (more so for 2-spot than 10-spot).

You think that works, or have you found many larvae that would prove it wrong?

Cheers!
Arp

To be honest I've done very little detailed work on larvae - when out counting I just put them down as Adalia! However, with the aid of your diagram I'll have a more detailed look this year, thanks.

My key (Majerus & Kearns) differentiates them on the basis of white/pale yellow central mark Ab4 inside Ab4i (inner) on 10-spot and yellow-orange/orange/orange red for 2-spot.
__________________
"Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence."
Napoleon Bonaparte
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 24-01-2008, 04:46 PM
Wild Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 895
Larva keys etc...

Hi Paul, thanks for the interesting reply! Of course, I only have one year's worth of "experience" and hardly no larva-literature at all. If I winn the lottery the first thing I do is order the old Hodek (the newer one doesn't seem to list the larvae anymore?). So all I (believe to) "know" comes from limited experience (fieldwork and breeding) and looking around on the web.

But there is/was not much ladybird larva stuff to be found on the web. I think I've personally updated "the web" with two or three larva species that had no images yet last spring and was pleasantly surprised to find some of these now also in the Flickr gallery of Gilles San Martin you linked to somewhere. So the web is getting better all the time

A somewhat complicated key, and unfortunatelly for some - in dutch, is located here: Page 1, Page 2, Page 3. The site also holds a Larva Thumbnails Page and a few "Quick reference" charts here: Ada.bip., Ada.dec., Coc.sep., Har.axy., Ana.oce., Cal.qua. and Hal.sed..

Going by their key/quick ref the difference is in the side-brushes indicated on my diagram too. Concerning the Ab4i brushes they mostly state that the brushes have more black on the outer half of the brush for Ada.bip. (compare the Quickrefs), but I always found that very unreliable on real animals. Ada.dec. is generally much "lighter" of colour than Ada.bip., in that the inter-brush "gray" areas also tend to be a lighter shade of gray (sometimes almost white).

I'll be checking for the colour differences noted by the Majerus key now too

However, as it seems, the Ab4i colouration isn't always present - at least on Ada.bip. it may not be. I've bought an old booklet by Klausnitzer this fall that has some larval info aswell, and he lists about 9 different colour combinations for Ada.bip. larvae (in black and white). My feeble attempt of a diagram was the result of trying to create an overview of these in colour and finding photos of the varieties to go with that, but I had tossed in the corner a few month ago as I wasn't happy with the diagrams at all and better ones would take too much time.

Well, so much for now. Maybe I'll still go ahead and create the overview sometime soon - will see.

Thanks for your input Paul - much appreciated!
Arp
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 25-01-2008, 07:01 AM
Active Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 76
Australian ladybirds

Quote:
Originally Posted by paul m View Post
I'll be loading a few ladybird pictures - they're one of the most photogenic of insect families!
By and large these will all be European. I'd love to see pictures of ladybirds from elsewhere in the world.
This was Europe's largest, the pine ladybird Anatis ocellata:
It's interesting to see these ladybirds from the other side of the world. I have uploaded a few ladybird pics from Australia to the member gallery. I'm not sure where else in the world you find these. A couple of them are shown below.

Fungus-eating Ladybird.


Transverse Ladybird.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 25-01-2008, 09:40 AM
paul m's Avatar
Really Wild Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sheffield, South Yorks, UK
Posts: 5,221
Now, that's what I like to see!
Australia has a good number of endemics - not found anywhere else in the world. Although a lot of Australasian ladybirds have been exported and used for biological control of pests. Cryptolaemus montrouzieri is commonly used for (indoor) control of mealybugs -

and the Vedalia beetle

was the first successful use of a predator to control a pest over a century ago. Someone at the time had the arduous job of going to Australia, collecting ladybirds and testing them on the citrus scale!

Quote:
Originally Posted by ozwildlife View Post
It's interesting to see these ladybirds from the other side of the world. I have uploaded a few ladybird pics from Australia to the member gallery. I'm not sure where else in the world you find these. A couple of them are shown below.
__________________
"Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence."
Napoleon Bonaparte

Last edited by paul m; 25-01-2008 at 09:43 AM. Reason: typo
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 25-01-2008, 11:36 AM
Wild Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 895
Hi John,

Great images of all those Aussie ladybirds (in the Gallery) - and no, we don't have a single one of those species here, so it's lovely to see such good pictures of them.

I might be bugging you for more images/info one of these days

Thanks!
Arp

P.S. Just visited your site (amazing photos!) and collected the larva from your site too (for my personal reference collection) - Keep 'm comming!

Last edited by Pudding4brains; 25-01-2008 at 11:43 AM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 25-01-2008, 03:28 PM
paul m's Avatar
Really Wild Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sheffield, South Yorks, UK
Posts: 5,221
Perhaps not surprising but we've had contact before - you gave me permission to use your picture of the larva of C. montrouzieri on my site!
REPRODUCTION of LADYBIRDS (Coccinellini and Chilocorini): life cycle

Thanks again. Pleased to see that your brilliant photographs continue to appear!

I'm tempted to suggest that we might see the steel-blue ladybird Steelblue Ladybird - Halmus chalybeus in Europe because a friend of mine accidentally brought one back from Sydney ... dead as it happens but with intercontinental flight being what it is ....

Quote:
Originally Posted by ozwildlife View Post
It's interesting to see these ladybirds from the other side of the world. I have uploaded a few ladybird pics from Australia to the member gallery. I'm not sure where else in the world you find these. A couple of them are shown below.
__________________
"Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence."
Napoleon Bonaparte
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply  

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


» Online Users: 287
8 members and 279 guests
Cybershot, ghij376, goosey, kbaac82, nopq201, rstu771, wholesalelacewigs201, zhangbingchao
Most users ever online was 1,909, 20-05-2010 at 09:27 AM.
» New Wildlife Threads
A List of Extinct Animals
Last post by tcvarlh
Yesterday 05:59 PM
8 Replies, 22,066 Views
ID please
Last post by shytonak
Yesterday 11:35 AM
0 Replies, 18 Views
ID please
Last post by shytonak
Yesterday 11:30 AM
0 Replies, 8 Views
ID please
Last post by shytonak
Yesterday 11:25 AM
0 Replies, 7 Views
Unk Wirral Fungi &...
Last post by black
01-09-2010 11:09 AM
4 Replies, 81 Views
Preservation of food...
Last post by goosey
01-09-2010 09:41 AM
0 Replies, 20 Views
Unidentified
Last post by goosey
01-09-2010 06:10 AM
2 Replies, 59 Views
Autumn Fungi
Last post by goosey
31-08-2010 12:31 PM
6 Replies, 154 Views
» New Community Threads
I recorded sounds from...
Last post by fashion_m
31-08-2010 07:50 AM
0 Replies, 24 Views
Hoge Veluwe National Park
Last post by goosey
22-08-2010 07:15 AM
2 Replies, 75 Views
Coming from the...
Last post by Alok
20-08-2010 05:22 PM
5 Replies, 203 Views
Hello everyone
Last post by acherontia
19-08-2010 04:42 PM
0 Replies, 81 Views
Greetings from...
Last post by Suzanne B
15-08-2010 09:25 PM
2 Replies, 70 Views
» Stats
Members: 11,107
Threads: 1,692
Posts: 9,235
Top Poster: goosey (5,444)
Welcome to our newest member, tina4166
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.1.0

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:35 AM.



SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39