Thread: Zoos
View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 15-06-2007, 10:34 AM
paul m's Avatar
paul m paul m is offline
Really Wild Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sheffield, UK
Posts: 1,551
I can believe that watching an animal in its native habitat is the best way but
there are many problems with 'nature tourism' (not just for tiger-watching ) - not the least being the pollution caused by people flying to see them. Tourists require accomodation and transport when visiting (e.g.) India - this impinges on the space available for animals - especially large mammals which need a vast area of undisturbed habitat for survival.

I suspect that the tiger will not last long in India unless something really serious is done to conserve it (e.g. http://www.france24.com/france24Publ...a6&cat=science ), so for my part I'll watch films! - if it does become extinct in the wild then I'm afraid we shall only see them in zoos ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhea View Post
I'd often seen tigers in Zoo's and wildlife Parks like Whipsnade etc- but once you see this amazing cat in the wild- you'll never be the same again. Its sheer power and beauty leaves you breathless. Its like a divine gift to be able to share the same air as it- even if for a few minutes. And the best part is - the animal completely ignores you, and just goes about his usual business. Check out this website-www.junglemantra.com. Bandhavgarh National Park has the highest density of Tigers amongst all the Parks in India- and its the best place for seeing Tigers in the wild.
__________________
"Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence."
Napoleon Bonaparte

Last edited by paul m; 15-06-2007 at 10:35 AM. Reason: typo and afterthought
Reply With Quote